![geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250](http://www.vgamuseum.info/media/k2/items/cache/c7726f5ad947c814df35c64905184dce_Generic.jpg)
- #Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 install#
- #Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 drivers#
- #Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 full size#
- #Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 software#
Though the game did slow down during some intense battle sequences, it was still fairly playable.
![geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/3e843ad8-effe-42ad-9087-96f3dd602e08.23ff5269eccea5ee80d90d43cbbc44e0.jpeg)
To showcase the visual performance of the 9250 we ran the game at a resolution of 1024x768 with all the detail settings maxed out.
#Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 full size#
To more clearly see the changes in image quality, open up the four images in different windows and Alt + Tab between them.Ĭlick Image To View Full Size - 1024x768 (Max Detail)įor those of you who are considering using this card for some occasional gaming we fired up Activison's latest expansion pack, United Offensive, for their very popular WWII game, Call of Duty. The most notable area is the vertical metal beams, in the bottom windows, near the tank. Moving from left to right, as the AA level was increased, you'll notice a slight decrease in the amount of "jaggies" along the edges of various objects. Located above are some screen shots taken with UT2004 at a resolution of 1024x768 with all detail settings maxed out. Image Comparison - Unreal Tournament 2004 The test results below where done using both the Diamond Stealth S100 and Diamond Stealth S110. We'll try to cover what we feel is important in our final testing and performance section. However, there are some very specific points of reference that are easily judged and apparent to any user. This is a somewhat subjective area that in many cases can come down to user preference, in some of the criteria. Quantifying image quality of a video card, is a relatively difficult task.
![geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250](https://computeuk.co.uk/shop/image/cache/data/Products/ComponentsM/104447-700x700.jpg)
![geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250](https://s2.manualzz.com/store/data/044881218_1-00752c17c2b3c7d533f2b423e8bae151.png)
Windows XP Professional SP2 (Fully Patched)
#Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 drivers#
Throughout our testing, ATi's drivers were configured for maximum visual quality.
#Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 software#
Lastly, we set Windows XP's Visual Effects to "best performance", installed the benchmarking software and ran all of the tests. Auto-Updating, System Restore, and Drive Indexing were then disabled, the hard drive was de-fragmented and a 768MB permanent page file was created. Then we installed all of the necessary drivers for the rest of our components and removed Windows Messenger from the system altogether.
#Geforce mx 4000 vs radeon 9250 install#
When the installation was complete, we installed the Intel chipset drivers and hit the Windows Update site to download and install all of the available updates. The hard drive was then formatted, and Windows XP Professional was installed. Then we set the memory to operate at 400MHz (in dual-channel mode) and set the AGP aperture size to 512MB. The first thing we did when configuring this test system was enter the BIOS and loaded the "High Performance Defaults". We tested the ATI Radeon 9250, on an i865G based Intel D865GBF motherboard, powered by an Intel Pentium 4 3.0CGHz CPU.